Is art in a way, in a nature vs. nurture debate about what is good art, and if so, does that validate the existence of universal taste?
I feel actually, that this is very similar to my last question. However, this is more of the argument of what does good art stimulate? Is it something that we are educated about, or is it the idea that good art will stimulate the deeper more human, more biological parts of us?
From what I gather though, it seems that art is really a mixture of well educated thought and emotional, personal thought. An educated individual can use his/her art to place several deeper emotions into an art. That way, a multitude of people can experience an array of emotion from a single piece. It gives a unique experience to who so ever looks at it. I feel that is the proper way to make good art.
No comments:
Post a Comment